Wrong to apportion blame for fatal accident

Were I the person who opened the off-side door of the car into the path of a cyclist without first checking to ensure that it was safe to do so, my conscience would be somewhat relieved on reading Councillor Braithwaite s letter (Sadness at cycle death, H

Were I the person who opened the off-side door of the car into the path of a cyclist without first checking to ensure that it was safe to do so, my conscience would be somewhat relieved on reading Councillor Braithwaite's letter (Sadness at cycle death, H&H February 11).

In effect, he is partially blaming the cyclist who died later for riding too close to the car in question - yet another example of victim-blaming.

Of course, he is right in advising cyclists to ride in a manner that may go some way to compensating for the danger to which they are exposed by the life-threatening and careless actions of vehicle occupants.

But think of that advice in relation to cyclists when riding down narrow streets: to provide his recommended metre clearance, cyclists would have to keep to the centre of the road, thereby exposing themselves to oncoming traffic - in addition to getting stressfully hooted at from behind!


You may also want to watch:


In any case, failure to ride in a manner that ensures such a clearance does not seem to me to justify an implied accusation of 'contributory negligence' on the part of the cyclist. Can a burglar be partially exonerated for his crime on the grounds that the householder had not made his home 'burglar-proof'?

Dr Mayer Hillman

Most Read

Become a Supporter

This newspaper has been a central part of community life for many years. Our industry faces testing times, which is why we're asking for your support. Every contribution will help us continue to produce local journalism that makes a measurable difference to our community.

Become a Supporter