Judge in HDV High Court review told Haringey Council acted with ‘no lack of democracy’
- Credit: Archant
A High Court judge deciding the lawfulness of Haringey Council’s £2billion regeneration plan was told there was no lack of democracy when the decisions which led to it getting the go ahead were made.
Ranjit Bhose QC stated the arguments as Haringey’s defence hit its stride in the second day of a judge led review at the Royal Courts of Justice.
After challenging a set of recommendations made ahead of a cabinet vote to push ahead with the HDV by the council’s overview and scrutiny committee, Mr Bhose said: “Existing residents and tenants have been kept informed about the HDV. There were no democratic deficiencies.
“There are no equality issues in this case,” he added.
A day earlier David Wolfe QC, the barrister acting for Gordon Peters who triggered the review, argued the public had not been consulted properly and the impact of the council’s estates renewal plan on vulnerable groups and minorities had not been assessed adequately.
Under the scheme, labelled the Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV), Haringey would transfer land and buildings into a joint venture with developer Lendlease.
The council argues the scheme will bring jobs and improve housing, something which it could not do without private sector investment and expertise.
- 1 The most expensive homes sold in Haringey in November 2021
- 2 Air ambulance mobilised as boy, 15, knifed in South Hampstead
- 3 'We don't need to drink more coffee' say cafés as Joe & The Juice moves in
- 4 'We're proud of what we do': Kossoffs celebrates six months in Kentish Town
- 5 Cops swoop on cannabis farm rumoured to be 'largest ever' busted in Haringey
- 6 3,000 new council homes for Haringey over next ten years
- 7 Italian sandwich shop opens in a Hampstead telephone box
- 8 Fundraising year begins at William IV pub in Hampstead
- 9 The man who wants to put trains among the trees from Muswell Hill to Highgate
- 10 Roadworks and rail disruptions in north London over the next week
But in the three day review which began yesterday Mr Justice Duncan Ouseley is tasked with deciding whether it was lawful for Haringey to set up the scheme in the way it did.
On whether or not Haringey failed to carry out its duty to consider the impact on vulnerable groups, Mr Bhose said the claimant’s challenge in this was “entirely artificial”.
The hearing continues.