How a century fluttered by at Alexandra Palace racetrack
CLLR Matt Cooke has responded to critics who oppose gambling at Alexandra Palace, pointing out that when it hosted horse racing, as it did for more than 100 years until 1970, outdoor gambling was a regular feature. His assurances that a casino is not on
CLLR Matt Cooke has responded to critics who oppose gambling at Alexandra Palace, pointing out that when it hosted horse racing, as it did for more than 100 years until 1970, outdoor gambling was a regular feature.
His assurances that a casino is not on the cards would carry more weight if it was not the intention of the trust to offload the Palace to a new owner. Who knows what they might have in mind in the long term? From a commercial point of view a casino at the Palace would be an obvious money spinner.
Back in the racetrack days, many a family's housekeeping disappeared into a bookmaker's black bag on race nights, never to be seen again. Those were different times, when it wasn't really possible to bet on anything other than dogs and horses, but nowadays bets are available on every conceivable aspect of virtually every sport. Even political contests are open to wagers, and the spread of online gambling, from virtual golf games played by imaginary figures, to party bingo, shows the catch-all nature of the gambling industry.
People don't need to venture from their living rooms to strike a bet, and in this context the availability of a limited betting facility for certain events at Alexandra Palace is unlikely to plunge either the nation or north London into a deep moral or social crisis. A permanent casino would be a different matter in terms of the whole ethos of what should always be an open and accessible asset for the whole of London.
You may also want to watch:
The spread of betting shops, however, continues unabated in some areas and it is understandable that Haringey Council's recent defeat in a court case against a betting chain's licensing application has increased concerns about the ability of local authorities to maintain some form of control.
The idea that a betting company could prevail in an application that was opposed by the council, the police (up to a point) and by local residents, is if anything much more worrying than the current prospect of occasional gambling within the confines of Alexandra Palace.
- 1 Nazanin may become 'bargaining chip' in Iran nuclear deal, warns husband
- 2 What's next? Covid-19 and the future of Hampstead Village
- 3 Arsenal boss Arteta faces injury crisis decisions
- 4 Optimism as Crouch End and Muswell Hill shops, bars and cafes reopen
- 5 Mary Feilding Guild: Warning of severe health impact on elderly residents
- 6 Camden's Levertons to arrange the funeral of Prince Philip on April 17
- 7 Crackdown on 'blue badge' disability parking fraud in Haringey
- 8 Hampstead, Highgate and Primrose Hill beer gardens reopening on April 12
- 9 Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe: Wait for second verdict could last 'until Easter'
- 10 Primrose Hill to close at night this weekend after antisocial behaviour