Existing dog powers should be enough
A few years ago English Heritage had a similar consultation when they wished to change the byelaws regarding dogs on leads at Kenwood. At the time I distributed literally hundreds of documents detailing their proposals and how to register concern with DE
A few years ago English Heritage had a similar consultation when they wished to change the byelaws regarding dogs on leads at Kenwood.
At the time I distributed literally hundreds of documents detailing their proposals and how to register concern with DEFRA. I think that the number of objections registered was 57 but the changes were approved by the appropriate minister and implemented by EH. I have never been able to access the results despite numerous requests.
Similarly, when EH introduced charges in the car park at Kenwood there was a public consultation and once again the results have never been publicised.
I have also asked EH on many occasions whether members of EH would be exempt from parking fees but am still waiting for a response.
You may also want to watch:
Byelaws on the Heath have always given managers the power to ban owners and their dogs from the Heath if a dog is out of control. I would have thought that these powers were quite enough.
A Farlow
Most Read
- 1 Swimmers find exotic python lurking outside lido
- 2 Curious Crouch End: From Mrs Hitler to the 'The Hornsey Revolution'
- 3 'Unacceptable': Fury over Crouch End roadworks diverting W5 bus
- 4 Squares Pizzeria: Authentic Italian meets effortless elegance
- 5 North London police officer suspended and charged with theft
- 6 Objectors fear housing plans threaten chance of Highgate pub return
- 7 'Decades of cycling infrastructure progress in just a year'
- 8 MP bemoans closure of Lloyds Bank in Muswell Hill
- 9 Heroic walker who raised thousands for charity dies aged 101
- 10 Golders Green Hippodrome sold as Islamic centre plan abandoned
Lyndale Avenue, NW2
