Existing dog powers should be enough
A few years ago English Heritage had a similar consultation when they wished to change the byelaws regarding dogs on leads at Kenwood. At the time I distributed literally hundreds of documents detailing their proposals and how to register concern with DE
A few years ago English Heritage had a similar consultation when they wished to change the byelaws regarding dogs on leads at Kenwood.
At the time I distributed literally hundreds of documents detailing their proposals and how to register concern with DEFRA. I think that the number of objections registered was 57 but the changes were approved by the appropriate minister and implemented by EH. I have never been able to access the results despite numerous requests.
Similarly, when EH introduced charges in the car park at Kenwood there was a public consultation and once again the results have never been publicised.
I have also asked EH on many occasions whether members of EH would be exempt from parking fees but am still waiting for a response.
You may also want to watch:
Byelaws on the Heath have always given managers the power to ban owners and their dogs from the Heath if a dog is out of control. I would have thought that these powers were quite enough.
A Farlow
Most Read
- 1 Anger over Thames Water and Westminster Council's flash floods response
- 2 Piers Plowright obituary: BBC and Hampstead star dies at 83
- 3 'Something out of Blade Runner?' BT eyes screen near cinema
- 4 O2 Centre: Developer says it 'will listen' but still aiming for 1,900 homes
- 5 Man charged with indecent exposure and voyeurism in West Hampstead
- 6 Suburb couple start canal concerts with afternoon tea
- 7 Thames Water 'sorry' after Finchley Road diversion sees cars damaged
- 8 Hampstead 'business hero' honoured for work with Soho Dairy street stall
- 9 Muswell Hill club wins 'Premier League' of junior chess
- 10 Camden councillors rally against constituency boundary changes
Lyndale Avenue, NW2
