Baby P social workers lose tribunal against Haringey Council
TWO social workers who were sacked by Haringey Council over the Baby P case have lost their claim for unfair dismissal.
Gillie Christou and Maria Ward claimed they were unjustly fired by Haringey Council in response to the public outcry about the little boy’s horrific death.
But an employment tribunal panel has ruled that the local authority acted reasonably in dismissing them because of serious failings in their care of the toddler.
Baby P, now named as Peter Connelly, was just 17-months-old when he died in a blood-spattered cot in Tottenham, on August 3 2007.
He had suffered more than 50 injuries despite being on the at-risk register and receiving 60 visits from social workers, police and health professionals over eight months.
You may also want to watch:
Peter’s mother, Tracey Connelly, her boyfriend Steven Barker, and his brother, Jason Owen, were jailed in May last year for causing or allowing the little boy’s death.
Ms Ward was Peter’s nominated social worker at Haringey Council from February 2007 until his death, and Ms Christou was her team manager.
- 1 'Picture of health': Mum's tribute to son who died of sudden cardiac arrest
- 2 Piers Plowright: 'An extraordinary force, devoted to Hampstead'
- 3 The Vagina Museum searches for new home as Camden Market leases end
- 4 Tennis coach 'distraught' at losing Belsize role amid club row
- 5 Haverstock Hill cycle lanes given the green light
- 6 Police investigate reported rape of teenager
- 7 Clapped in the street - and assaulted: Staff call for behaviour change in A&E
- 8 Barnet Council called in bailiffs over non-existent council tax bill
- 9 London Zoo's aviary unwrapped to create new monkey home
- 10 Ken Clarke's Infected Blood Inquiry words were 'offensive' – campaigners
The pair were sacked after an investigation revealed there was a period in mid-2007 when they did not know where the child was.
Peter’s mother claimed she had taken the little boy to visit her sick uncle in Cricklewood, despite being told to return home.
Ms Ward was also found to have failed to meet a requirement to see him at least once a fortnight.
The employment tribunal panel concluded: “There is no doubt in our minds that, whilst there may have been media pressure and political pressure and those involved had in mind the tragic death of Peter Connelly, the facts and beliefs which led them to dismiss the claimants’ appeals against their dismissals were, in Ms Ward’s case, the failure to maintain the required visiting frequency and, in both cases, the poor professional judgment (as the appeal panels expressed it) demonstrated by both claimants in relation to the Cricklewood absence.
“It is not in our view the case that those involved in the appeal panels bowed to the pressure to which we have referred.”
The panel ruled in favour of the local authority by a majority of two to one in its judgment, which was handed down on Wednesday.
A council spokesman said today: “We’re pleased that the tribunal found in our favour. Ms Ward and Ms Christou were dismissed for gross misconduct because they failed to ensure Baby Peter was visited regularly and lost contact with him at a critical time. The judgement vindicates our decision to end their employment with the council. Our focus remains on continued improvements to the children’s safeguarding service, as recently validated by Ofsted.”
In May, a General Social Care Council (GSCC) disciplinary committee suspended Ms Ward for two months and Ms Christou for four months - on top of a 16-month interim suspension ahead of the hearing - for their misconduct in the case.
The pair admitted failing to ensure Peter was visited regularly enough, not keeping adequate records and losing contact with him for a time.
But the GSCC panel ruled they could remain on the social care register, allowing them to resume working with vulnerable children after the end of their suspension.