Camden vow to try and take fight against HS2 to Supreme Court
- Credit: Archant
Camden Council has vowed to take their battle against government plans for the High Speed 2 rail link to the Supreme Court.
They want to overturn a decision to dismiss the council’s appeal against the controversial route.
The council joined 14 other local authorities in appealing against a previous High Court ruling to allow plans for HS2 – which will link London Euston with Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds – to go ahead.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the case yesterday but the council pledged to keep fighting the proposals, which will see large parts of Camden blighted by construction works.
The rail line will affect 477 homes and cause havoc in Camden Town – including the demolition and reconstruction of the famous Camden Lock and Camden Road bridges.
You may also want to watch:
The council has been granted leave to appeal the decision again, which would take the case all the way to the Supreme Court, the highest court of appeal.
It may also lobby for more compensation for residents and businesses who will lose out as a result of the railway’s construction, or try to get the best mitigation possible.
- 1 'Picture of health': Mum's tribute to son who died of sudden cardiac arrest
- 2 Police investigate reported rape of teenager
- 3 Haverstock Hill cycle lanes given the green light
- 4 The Vagina Museum searches for new home as Camden Market leases end
- 5 Piers Plowright: 'An extraordinary force, devoted to Hampstead'
- 6 Tennis coach 'distraught' at losing Belsize role amid club row
- 7 Barnet Council called in bailiffs over non-existent council tax bill
- 8 Clapped in the street - and assaulted: Staff call for behaviour change in A&E
- 9 Parliament Hill viewpoint works delayed by nesting birds
- 10 Letter on shopping for one!
Cllr Sarah Hayward, leader of Camden Council, said: “We are extremely disappointed with today’s decision and remain committed to use all means necessary to oppose this fundamentally flawed scheme.
“We believe that there are serious defects in the government’s proposals for HS2 and urge them yet again to reconsider their plans, which have ignored the evidence of the damage it will cause to our residents, visitors and businesses.”
The first appeal was partially based on the transport secretary’s decision to go ahead with HS2 without producing an Equality Impact Assessment, which the council claims was “unlawful”.