BOB HALL: Extensive support for new Heath proposals
There has been considerable discussion over the past weeks about the proposal to provide a new access route for vehicles to the existing maintenance depot and staff yard at Parliament Hill on the Heath. The issue has been clouded by inaccurate comments le
There has been considerable discussion over the past weeks about the proposal to provide a new access route for vehicles to the existing maintenance depot and staff yard at Parliament Hill on the Heath.
The issue has been clouded by inaccurate comments leading, it would seem, to a growing misunderstanding both with respect to what new "road" is proposed and what it is intended to achieve.
As part of an application to the Heritage Lottery Fund to help fund general improvements to the Parliament Hill area, including finishing restoration of the listed 1930s Lido, where the City is providing �1.8million as match funding, we included a solution to a dangerous situation which exists on a stretch of the busiest access way on the Heath.
This is the stretch from Highgate Road along the Broadwalk to the junction just south-west of the bandstand with the danger as a result of shared use between pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles.
You may also want to watch:
The proposal is that a different route for access by vehicles to the depot and staff yard should be established. This involves creating a length of new access way some 200m long and some three metres wide which would run along a very short section of the edge of the Heath, namely the southern and eastern boundaries of the cricket field immediately to the south west of the depot/yard.
Despite some of the assertions made, there was considerable consultation with the public last summer before the bid was submitted to the Lottery Fund on September 30.
- 1 Owner mourns Highgate station’s beloved black cat
- 2 Police officer suffers leg injury after BMW stopped during 'routine patrol'
- 3 North London nurses: 1% NHS pay offer is a 'kick in the teeth'
- 4 London elections 2021 live: Latest results as they come in
- 5 Swimmers launch legal challenge to charges at Hampstead Heath Ponds
- 6 Teen charged with killing 21-year-old man in Brent Cross
- 7 Five things we learned from Arsenal's Europa League exit
- 8 'Unacceptable' HGV use by developers in Church Row writes off 3 cars
- 9 Seven things to do in Hampstead and Highgate after May 17
- 10 St John's Wood High Street traders' fears after Harry's closure
Some 90 written comments showing varying degrees of opposition to the new access way proposal were received together with other non-supportive comments at roadshows during the consultation period.
There was, however, as a result of the consultation, extensive support for the proposals, including the new access way proposal.
Before reaching decisions, the City is required to consult the statutorily established Hampstead Heath Consultative Committee, the advice from which is both much valued and carefully considered.
All submissions were carefully evaluated, but the comparison between the existing level of pedestrian use of the present access way compared to the alternative proposed - which will not involve any pedestrian movements along the alternative route suggested - persuaded the consultative committee and subsequently the City's Hampstead Heath Management Committee that the balance of interest of the Heath users in general supported the new proposals.
The City of London has held the Heath since 1987 and thereafter managed it at no cost to the taxpayer. It has a duty to seek to ensure that the Heath, which has more than seven million visitors each year, is as safe as possible for its users. It is wonderful that people love the Heath so dearly and, of course, it is appreciated that decisions can raise strong feelings. But, in the end, after proper consultation we have to take responsibility for a decision.
While our view is that this proposal is a good solution to the problem at the Broadwalk, we have made it abundantly clear that if there is another approach to the pedestrian/vehicle conflict, then this can be considered - provided it is viable, it can be resourced and it solves the pedestrian/ vehicle conflict issue.
It has been suggested that the reduction by about a third in vehicular traffic presently accessing the Parliament Hill depot, following the removal of some of the activities to the Kenwood staff yard, means that the continuing use of the Broadwalk by pedestrians, cyclists and vehicles can be managed safely. We do not agree. However, this point can be looked at again very carefully, by reference to accepted norms and standards, to assess its validity and application with respect to the Broadwalk.
It is anticipated that the result of the Lottery bid will be known in the next four to six weeks. That being so, it seems sensible, therefore, to wait until then before launching into further detailed consideration of the matter.
The City has a long record over the last century or so of preserving open spaces from development or dereliction - Epping Forest, Burnham Beeches, Highgate Wood, for example.
It was privileged to have the opportunity to continue this custodianship on behalf of the public with respect to the Heath in 1987. It has since then spent some �85million on the Heath out of its own resources. It is willing to continue this investment. It deals with proposals with respect to the management of the Heath rationally and transparently. We have been open and accurate about what has been proposed.
o Bob Hall is chairman of the Hampstead Heath Management Committee.